| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Hunley, Douglas" <douglas(dot)hunley(at)openscg(dot)com>, Tim Goodaire <tgoodaire(at)dyn(dot)com>, pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FSM corruption and standby servers |
| Date: | 2016-10-31 18:19:24 |
| Message-ID: | 23813.1477937964@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I would have thought that the referenced page is clear enough about
>> needing to check the standbys; do you think it isn't?
> I can see how the following is a bit loose for someone not super-familiar
> with WAL.
Yeah. On the other hand, I don't want people who aren't running
replication to stop reading as soon as they see something about standby
servers. I tweaked the existing wording a bit to emphasize that standbys
can be corrupt even with a valid master; hopefully that's enough.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Poul Kristensen | 2016-10-31 21:46:43 | Re: FSM corruption and standby servers |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-10-31 17:27:44 | Re: FSM corruption and standby servers |