From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Baldur Norddahl <bbn-pgsql(dot)general(at)clansoft(dot)dk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: postgresql start/stop/status script |
Date: | 2005-04-20 13:53:19 |
Message-ID: | 23784.1114005199@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Baldur Norddahl wrote:
>> Is there a better way to query the status of postgresql? I would
>> expect it to at least check that the process in the PID is actually
>> running and that it is a postgresql process.
> Maybe try
> test $(readlink /proc/$pid/exe) = /usr/bin/postgres
I think the question stands though: why doesn't pg_ctl check that the
PID in the lockfile corresponds to a live process? A quick kill(pid,0)
would raise the robustness of the status check quite a lot, and now that
the code is in C it's a trivial addition.
Unless someone sees a reason not to do this, I will throw the change
into current and 8.0 branches.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexandre | 2005-04-20 13:57:49 | Re: Simplified (a-la [G|N]DBM) DB access |
Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2005-04-20 13:39:18 | Re: Simplified (a-la [G|N]DBM) DB access |