Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT
Date: 2006-01-06 17:18:14
Message-ID: 23781.1136567894@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> FYI, SQL03 defines GRANT SEQUENCE.

Oh. Well, then that gives us precedent to go by. What do they specify
as the privileges for sequences?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-01-06 17:23:55 Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-01-06 17:16:16 Re: catalog corruption bug

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-01-06 17:23:55 Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-01-06 17:13:55 Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT