From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Doug Doole <ddoole(at)salesforce(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: Faster Expression Processing and Tuple Deforming (including JIT) |
Date: | 2016-12-06 18:56:28 |
Message-ID: | 23766.1481050588@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I'm posting a quite massive series of WIP patches here, to get some
> feedback.
I guess the $64 question that has to be addressed here is whether we're
prepared to accept LLVM as a run-time dependency. There are some reasons
why we might not be:
* The sheer mass of the dependency. What's the installed footprint of
LLVM, versus a Postgres server? How hard is it to install from source?
* How will we answer people who say they can't accept having a compiler
installed on their production boxes for security reasons?
* Are there any currently-interesting platforms that LLVM doesn't work
for? (I'm worried about RISC-V as much as legacy systems.)
I concur with your feeling that hand-rolled JIT is right out. But
I'm not sure that whatever performance gain we might get in this
direction is worth the costs.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-12-06 18:59:18 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Account for catalog snapshot in PGXACT->xmin updates. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-12-06 18:36:09 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Account for catalog snapshot in PGXACT->xmin updates. |