Re: PITR COPY Failure (was Point in Time Recovery)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PITR COPY Failure (was Point in Time Recovery)
Date: 2004-07-22 00:43:07
Message-ID: 23762.1090456987@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz> writes:
> Looks good to me. Log file numbering scheme seems to have changed - is
> that part of the fix too?.

That's for timelines ... it's not directly related but I thought I
should put in both changes at once to avoid forcing an extra initdb.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2004-07-22 01:51:04 Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2004-07-22 00:39:59 Re: PITR COPY Failure (was Point in Time Recovery)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-07-22 00:44:40 Re: PreallocXlogFiles
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2004-07-22 00:41:01 Re: PreallocXlogFiles

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-22 01:01:59 Re: autovacuum integration attempt #3
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2004-07-22 00:39:59 Re: PITR COPY Failure (was Point in Time Recovery)