From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)refractions(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kevin Neufeld <kneufeld(at)refractions(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: uuid type for postgres |
Date: | 2005-09-07 04:24:11 |
Message-ID: | 23749.1126067051@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)refractions(dot)net> writes:
> I am not sure if I heard clearly from the core team that a self-
> contained, BSD-licensed uuid would be accepted(able)?
I don't think any of the other core members weighed in on this thread,
so speaking strictly for myself: BSD license is an issue, and
portability is an issue. I've heard enough to convince me that the
demand exists, but the legal and technical issues remain.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2005-09-07 04:41:08 | Re: need info about extensibility in other databases |
Previous Message | Paul Ramsey | 2005-09-07 03:40:08 | Re: uuid type for postgres |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Louise Catherine | 2005-09-07 05:05:06 | AGE function |
Previous Message | Paul Ramsey | 2005-09-07 03:40:08 | Re: uuid type for postgres |