Re: [PATCH] add CLUSTER table ORDER BY index

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Holger Schurig <holgerschurig(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add CLUSTER table ORDER BY index
Date: 2007-03-28 13:48:33
Message-ID: 23745.1175089713@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Though I don't think we're implementing "CLUSTER table ORDER BY col1,
> col2" anytime soon, ORDER BY does imply that a list of columns is to
> follow. How about "CLUSTER table USING index"?

+1 ... AFAIR there was 0 discussion of the exact syntax before,
so I don't feel wedded to ORDER BY.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-03-28 14:59:25 Re: autovacuum: multiple workers
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-03-28 13:39:47 Re: autovacuum: multiple workers