| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 64bit build vs 32 bit build |
| Date: | 2006-05-30 14:36:29 |
| Message-ID: | 23741.1148999789@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:50:23AM -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
>> Is it possible to use a binary copy of the cluster on a 64 bit build
>> of pg 7.4.x that was created on a 32bit bild of 7.4.x
> I doubt it very much. Or put another way, no effort has been put into
> making it work...
Even more to the point: the reason it won't work is that MAXALIGN is
probably different in the two builds. Very recent PG releases check
this via a pg_control field, but 7.4.x will probably just crash.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-30 15:10:43 | Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date? |
| Previous Message | Jeff McKenna | 2006-05-30 14:31:09 | Re: Compile libpq with vc8 |