Re: pg_dump -j against standbys

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump -j against standbys
Date: 2016-05-25 14:01:34
Message-ID: 236956bf-34af-8ddc-cb6e-9d2c64dce4fe@joh.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 25/05/16 15:59, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> This patch will cause pg_dump to fail entirely against pre-9.0 servers.
>> You need to execute the test conditionally.
>>
>
> Ugh. can I blame coding while too jetlagged?

You could try blaming Magnus. Oh, wait..

.m

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-05-25 14:02:13 Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2016-05-25 13:59:06 Re: pg_dump -j against standbys