| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: View definition formatting |
| Date: | 2003-04-01 19:18:12 |
| Message-ID: | 2369.1049224692@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Perhaps as a workaround you could invent a standard indentation format and
> format the rules automatically that way, so that users will be able to
> find everything in the same place automatically after the second edit
> cycle.
Perhaps we could make pg_get_ruledef and friends try to prettyprint
their output a little better, instead of duplicating such logic in
various clients (which couldn't do nearly as well at it anyway without
re-parsing the string :-().
Does anyone have code that depends on these functions returning
single-line output? (I suppose the pg_rules and pg_views views might
get a bit ugly, but perhaps psql could be taught to format data with
embedded newlines better than it does now...)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-04-01 19:49:50 | Re: View definition formatting |
| Previous Message | efesar | 2003-04-01 18:38:09 | Re: pgadmin3 query tools |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-04-01 19:49:50 | Re: View definition formatting |
| Previous Message | pgsql | 2003-04-01 18:55:26 | Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? |