From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: View definition formatting |
Date: | 2003-04-01 19:18:12 |
Message-ID: | 2369.1049224692@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Perhaps as a workaround you could invent a standard indentation format and
> format the rules automatically that way, so that users will be able to
> find everything in the same place automatically after the second edit
> cycle.
Perhaps we could make pg_get_ruledef and friends try to prettyprint
their output a little better, instead of duplicating such logic in
various clients (which couldn't do nearly as well at it anyway without
re-parsing the string :-().
Does anyone have code that depends on these functions returning
single-line output? (I suppose the pg_rules and pg_views views might
get a bit ugly, but perhaps psql could be taught to format data with
embedded newlines better than it does now...)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-04-01 19:49:50 | Re: View definition formatting |
Previous Message | efesar | 2003-04-01 18:38:09 | Re: pgadmin3 query tools |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-04-01 19:49:50 | Re: View definition formatting |
Previous Message | pgsql | 2003-04-01 18:55:26 | Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? |