| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | taem(at)linukz(dot)org, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #15796: [not a bug actually] vacuumlo - its name is confusing |
| Date: | 2019-05-08 13:25:50 |
| Message-ID: | 23675.1557321950@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 09:52:33AM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
>> I think vacuumlo's name is confusing, especially for newbies. As we know,
>> vacuumlo's purpose is to remove orphaned large objects, not to vacuum
>> them.
>> Is it possible to rename this utility? I am sorry, if it is already
>> discussed.
> The tool is old enough to vote (94bb87f from 1999), and holds this
> name since its birth. So a renaming may be more annoying than
> anything else I am afraid.
Yeah, the backwards-compatibility hit seems rather disproportionate
to the value of a change.
Also, I'm not really convinced that a name change would be much of
an improvement. Zapping unreferenced large objects is sort of like
what VACUUM does, if you aren't too picky about details ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Monica Maria Piza Merchan | 2019-05-08 16:03:29 | prerunscript.command.line.error |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-05-08 13:14:59 | Re: BUG #15796: [not a bug actually] vacuumlo - its name is confusing |