Re: temporary tables are logged somehow?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrey Lizenko <lizenko79(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: temporary tables are logged somehow?
Date: 2015-01-22 15:44:26
Message-ID: 23653.1421941466@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Andrey Lizenko <lizenko79(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> 3. They are not WAL-logged.
>> Whats wrong with it in my case?

> Nothing. Temporary tables are not WAL-logged, but transaction commit is.

Right. I think there is some optimization for transactions that only
wrote temp-table data, but it could at most be skipping fsync of the
transaction commit record, not omitting generating it entirely.

Also, changes to the system catalogs are always WAL-logged; so creation
and deletion of a temp table cause some amount of WAL output, even if
manipulation of the table's contents does not.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G Johnston 2015-01-22 15:49:13 Re: how to calculate standard deviation from a table
Previous Message David Johnston 2015-01-22 15:43:09 Re: how to duplicate data for few times by SQL command in PG