| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Clarify description of CIDR-address column |
| Date: | 2006-11-18 02:38:05 |
| Message-ID: | 23650.1163817485@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Clarify description of CIDR-address column of pg_hba.conf, to discourage
>> people from trying notations like '10.6/16', which is accepted but does
>> not mean what you probably think. Per example from Paul Forgey.
> Isn't the real problem here that 10.6 doesn't mean what you probably think?
If you're proposing that we change the behavior of inet_aton(), I don't
think that's much of a solution, since then people who do remember the
old notation ... or recognize the analogy to IPv6 abbreviations, which
are not a lot different ... would get burnt. We can't do it anyway on
most modern platforms, unless we want to replace all of getaddrinfo()
which seems pretty unappealing.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2006-11-18 02:51:56 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Clarify description of CIDR-address |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-11-18 00:05:54 | Re: pgsql: Clarify description of CIDR-address column |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2006-11-18 02:39:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Shutting down a warm standby database in 8.2beta3 |
| Previous Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2006-11-18 02:37:36 | Re: zic data updates |