From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Clarify description of CIDR-address column |
Date: | 2006-11-18 02:38:05 |
Message-ID: | 23650.1163817485@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Clarify description of CIDR-address column of pg_hba.conf, to discourage
>> people from trying notations like '10.6/16', which is accepted but does
>> not mean what you probably think. Per example from Paul Forgey.
> Isn't the real problem here that 10.6 doesn't mean what you probably think?
If you're proposing that we change the behavior of inet_aton(), I don't
think that's much of a solution, since then people who do remember the
old notation ... or recognize the analogy to IPv6 abbreviations, which
are not a lot different ... would get burnt. We can't do it anyway on
most modern platforms, unless we want to replace all of getaddrinfo()
which seems pretty unappealing.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2006-11-18 02:51:56 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Clarify description of CIDR-address |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-11-18 00:05:54 | Re: pgsql: Clarify description of CIDR-address column |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2006-11-18 02:39:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Shutting down a warm standby database in 8.2beta3 |
Previous Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2006-11-18 02:37:36 | Re: zic data updates |