Re: Bug #746: Drop user damages security on tables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: parkerm(at)hst(dot)stoneridge(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug #746: Drop user damages security on tables
Date: 2002-08-27 06:04:21
Message-ID: 23649.1030428261@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
>> What is a "-601 error"? There's surely no such message in Postgres.

> There surely is in ecpg:
> ecpgerrno.h:#define ECPG_WARNING_QUERY_IGNORED -601

Hmm ... maybe, but a query-ignored failure could only happen in the
case of multiple commands wrapped in a transaction block. Which still
leaves us needing more context than the complaint offered ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Grégory Faruch 2002-08-27 08:11:00 jdbc example datastyle.java
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-27 05:48:33 Re: Command-line client sometimes misinterprets tabs for nulls