| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Christofides <michael(at)pgmustard(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: once more: documentation search indexing |
| Date: | 2022-04-18 18:04:11 |
| Message-ID: | 2364010.1650305051@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> What would be the actual *advantage* of excluding them?
The immediate problem is that Google is still preferentially returning old
pages in some cases, e.g. top hit for "postgres gist gin index" is still
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/textsearch-indexes.html
Now maybe that just means they've not completely reindexed since we made
the canonical-version change, so I'm content to wait awhile longer
before concluding that that change wasn't sufficient. But we should be
considering the possibility that it wasn't.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2022-04-18 20:10:23 | Re: GSOC proposal for Improve pgarchives by Yedil |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2022-04-18 17:46:12 | Re: once more: documentation search indexing |