Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Date: 2006-01-10 01:20:33
Message-ID: 23631.1136856033@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> As long as the locale is consistent I think we're OK (is that right, Tom?)

Right.

> Would that mean not using any of initdb's locale settings?

Yeah, you'd want to not use the --locale switch for initdb, and also not
to change the system-wide locale settings afterwards.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-01-10 01:24:12 Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-01-10 01:06:03 Re: cleaning up plperl warnings