| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql 7.4 migration to (partially) new disks |
| Date: | 2006-09-17 18:15:13 |
| Message-ID: | 23601.1158516913@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> writes:
>> If you copy the *entire* data tree (data, xlog, clog, any outside
>> tablespaces), and use exactly the same Postgres executables at both
>> ends, then it should pretty much Just Work.
> Thats what i feared from the begining. (some connection between the data dir
> and the executable, really, why does the executable need to be exactly the
> same,
> if we are talking about minor postgresql upgrade 7.4.12->7.4.13?)
Well, a minor version update won't in itself break anything; what would
break things is changing certain build options (such as
integer-datetimes) or switching to a different architecture (such as
x86 -> x86_64).
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2006-09-17 18:38:47 | Re: real and effective user ids must match |
| Previous Message | Achilleas Mantzios | 2006-09-17 08:57:57 | Re: Postgresql 7.4 migration to (partially) new disks |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-17 18:49:10 | Re: transaction confusion |
| Previous Message | Sim Zacks | 2006-09-17 15:18:35 | Re: remote duplicate rows |