Re: Postgresql 7.4 migration to (partially) new disks

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql 7.4 migration to (partially) new disks
Date: 2006-09-17 18:15:13
Message-ID: 23601.1158516913@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-general

Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> writes:
>> If you copy the *entire* data tree (data, xlog, clog, any outside
>> tablespaces), and use exactly the same Postgres executables at both
>> ends, then it should pretty much Just Work.

> Thats what i feared from the begining. (some connection between the data dir
> and the executable, really, why does the executable need to be exactly the
> same,
> if we are talking about minor postgresql upgrade 7.4.12->7.4.13?)

Well, a minor version update won't in itself break anything; what would
break things is changing certain build options (such as
integer-datetimes) or switching to a different architecture (such as
x86 -> x86_64).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2006-09-17 18:38:47 Re: real and effective user ids must match
Previous Message Achilleas Mantzios 2006-09-17 08:57:57 Re: Postgresql 7.4 migration to (partially) new disks

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-17 18:49:10 Re: transaction confusion
Previous Message Sim Zacks 2006-09-17 15:18:35 Re: remote duplicate rows