| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | "Hackers List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Really annoying comments... |
| Date: | 2002-04-19 18:53:49 |
| Message-ID: | 2359.1019242429@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> writes:
> COMMENT ON DATABASE db IS 'Comment';
> Now switch databases. Comment is gone.
Yeah, it's not very helpful. I'm not sure why we bothered to implement
that in the first place.
> I suppose in order to add a comment field to pg_database it would need
> to be toasted or something (ton of work). Any other way to fix this?
I'm more inclined to rip it out ;-). I don't think it's worth the
trouble. Keeping database comments someplace else than pg_description
is certainly *not* the way to go --- everything that reads them would
have to be tweaked too.
What does need to be added at the moment is COMMENT ON SCHEMA (a/k/a
namespace).
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Gray | 2002-04-19 19:12:06 | commands subdirectory continued -code cleanup |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-19 18:43:42 | Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details |