Re: Really annoying comments...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
Cc: "Hackers List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Really annoying comments...
Date: 2002-04-19 18:53:49
Message-ID: 2359.1019242429@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> writes:
> COMMENT ON DATABASE db IS 'Comment';
> Now switch databases. Comment is gone.

Yeah, it's not very helpful. I'm not sure why we bothered to implement
that in the first place.

> I suppose in order to add a comment field to pg_database it would need
> to be toasted or something (ton of work). Any other way to fix this?

I'm more inclined to rip it out ;-). I don't think it's worth the
trouble. Keeping database comments someplace else than pg_description
is certainly *not* the way to go --- everything that reads them would
have to be tweaked too.

What does need to be added at the moment is COMMENT ON SCHEMA (a/k/a
namespace).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Gray 2002-04-19 19:12:06 commands subdirectory continued -code cleanup
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-04-19 18:43:42 Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details