Re: Any plans to expose publicly (via stored proc) relation_needs_vacanalyze, or some flavour of do_autovacuum?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vlad Romascanu <vromascanu(at)accurev(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Any plans to expose publicly (via stored proc) relation_needs_vacanalyze, or some flavour of do_autovacuum?
Date: 2010-09-14 02:01:51
Message-ID: 23577.1284429711@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Vlad Romascanu <vromascanu(at)accurev(dot)com> writes:
> The logical, amended solution would then be to have the "writer"
> session perform, after INSERTion but before COMMITTing, the same
> calculation that the autovacuum daemon currently performs inside
> relation_needs_vacanalyze, based on the same configuration parameters
> that the autovacuum daemon uses, before deciding whether to explicitly
> ANALYZE or not the affected application tables. Ideally one would not
> want to duplicate the relation_needs_vacanalyze logic (not to mention
> having to guess the value of last_anl_tuples, which is not exposed via
> any storedproc -- one would have to assume that it is more or less
> equivalent to pg_class.reltuples.)

I don't know if you actually looked at that code, but it's driven off of
statistics counters that are only updated at commit; and furthermore are
maintained in a different process altogether. So what you have in mind
isn't going to work ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 夏武 2010-09-14 03:02:22 Re: Help! pg_dump: Error message from server: ERROR: cache lookup failed for type 19
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2010-09-14 01:58:56 Re: Post Install / Secure PostgreSQL