| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | David Rickard <David(dot)Rickard(at)GTScompanies(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org, Judith Strawser <judiths(at)GTScompanies(dot)com>, Don Walters <dwalters(at)GTScompanies(dot)com> | 
| Subject: | Re: Capturing vacuum output | 
| Date: | 2003-10-29 22:35:05 | 
| Message-ID: | 23563.1067466905@sss.pgh.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice | 
David Rickard <David(dot)Rickard(at)GTScompanies(dot)com> writes:
> all that gets captured is the backend database commands--VACUUM <dbname> 
> etc; thinking that the verbose output was going to something besides 
> stdout, we tried
> vacuumdb -a -f -z -v 2> ${pg_log}/vaclog.log
> and got the error message: "cannot vacuum all databases and a specific one 
> at the same time";
> To what I/O stream does the verbose output get written, and how can we 
> capture it?
It goes to stderr.  The above command looks okay to me; perhaps you need
to get rid of the spaces between 2> and the target file.  It sounds like
vacuumdb thinks it is seeing an additional command-line argument besides
the switches.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mel Jamero | 2003-10-30 07:05:44 | Re: derive the sequence name of a column | 
| Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 2003-10-29 21:53:47 | Re: logging messages this time |