From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "PostgreSQL WWW" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org |
Date: | 2009-07-03 20:34:35 |
Message-ID: | 23558.1246653275@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Currently, it seems that most or all of the entries are links to
>> archived messages. Scraping the date from the underlying message
>> would be the best thing.
> Just for purposes of conversion, or as a long-term behavior?
Well, right at the moment I was just thinking of the conversion problem,
but it wouldn't be a horrible idea to make it a permanent behavior for
entries that include a message reference.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-07-03 20:43:21 | Re: commitfest.postgresql.org |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-07-03 20:28:14 | Re: First CommitFest: July 15th |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-07-03 20:43:21 | Re: commitfest.postgresql.org |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-07-03 20:09:13 | Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org |