| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Subject: | Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI |
| Date: | 2024-12-17 18:09:49 |
| Message-ID: | 2354849.1734458989@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> Was about to apply that, but then started to wonder if we don't need the same
>> for configure? And it sure looks like that has the same problem?
>> Which also confuses me some, at some point this presumably worked?
> The configure path does work on NetBSD 10, and has for some time.
Ah, sorry, I'd forgotten that bsd_auth.h only exists on OpenBSD.
We correctly detect that the header is not there on NetBSD.
I tried it on OpenBSD 7.0, which is the only OpenBSD image I have
laying about at the moment, and configure correctly finds that the
"AC_CHECK_HEADER(bsd_auth.h, [], ...)" test succeeds. So it looks
to me like we should not need the sys/types.h include --- unless
they broke it in some more-recent release?
(It looks like none of our OpenBSD BF animals are testing
--with-bsd-auth, which is surely bad.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2024-12-17 18:10:50 | Re: Remaining dependency on setlocale() |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2024-12-17 17:57:13 | Re: Exceptional md.c paths for recovery and zero_damaged_pages |