| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: holdable cursors |
| Date: | 2003-03-31 17:09:40 |
| Message-ID: | 23541.1049130580@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
> From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
>> Yes, you need to do that. Leaving it for the next postmaster restart
>> isn't acceptable (production sites don't restart the postmaster often).
> Would it make any sense for vacuum to look around for (and clean up) unused
> temp files left either from this or sorts etc....
I see no need for that. If a backend leaves temp files on normal exit,
the backend is broken and must be fixed. If it leaves temp files upon
crashing, well we can't expect anything from it; but that scenario will
cause a postmaster restart, which will clean out the temp files.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-03-31 20:48:07 | Re: Deferred trigger cleanup |
| Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2003-03-31 17:06:34 | Re: holdable cursors |