| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | y39chen <yan-jack(dot)chen(at)nokia(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: Is there possibility btree_redo with XLOG_BTREE_DELETE done between standby_redo and the end of backup | 
| Date: | 2017-05-24 15:47:13 | 
| Message-ID: | 2353.1495640833@sss.pgh.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> This looks a whole lot like a bug we fixed in 9.3.15, cf
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/DB5PR07MB15416C65687A1EA9AC0D26F8D6E00%40DB5PR07MB1541.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
> To which commit are you referring here? I don't recall any fixes
> related to that, and there is nothing in the git history indicating
> so.
Wup, sorry, I quoted the wrong thread mentioning
btree_xlog_delete_get_latestRemovedXid.  The right one is
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/00F0B2CEF6D0CEF8A90119D4%40eje.credativ.lan
and the patch is
Author: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Branch: master [0e0f43d6f] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400
Branch: REL9_6_STABLE Release: REL9_6_0 [3fc489cb3] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400
Branch: REL9_5_STABLE Release: REL9_5_5 [c40bb1155] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400
Branch: REL9_4_STABLE Release: REL9_4_10 [f4e40537e] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400
Branch: REL9_3_STABLE Release: REL9_3_15 [baf111d31] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400
Branch: REL9_2_STABLE Release: REL9_2_19 [823df401d] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400
Branch: REL9_1_STABLE Release: REL9_1_24 [e3439a455] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400
    Prevent starting a standalone backend with standby_mode on.
    
    This can't really work because standby_mode expects there to be more
    WAL arriving, which there will not ever be because there's no WAL
    receiver process to fetch it.  Moreover, if standby_mode is on then
    hot standby might also be turned on, causing even more strangeness
    because that expects read-only sessions to be executing in parallel.
    Bernd Helmle reported a case where btree_xlog_delete_get_latestRemovedXid
    got confused, but rather than band-aiding individual problems it seems
    best to prevent getting anywhere near this state in the first place.
    Back-patch to all supported branches.
    
    In passing, also fix some omissions of errcodes in other ereport's in
    readRecoveryCommandFile().
    
    Michael Paquier (errcode hacking by me)
    
    Discussion: <00F0B2CEF6D0CEF8A90119D4(at)eje(dot)credativ(dot)lan>
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | stevenchang1213 | 2017-05-24 15:48:04 | Re: Current best practice for maximum shared_buffers settings on big hardware? | 
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-05-24 15:39:27 | Re: Is there possibility btree_redo with XLOG_BTREE_DELETE done between standby_redo and the end of backup |