From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | y39chen <yan-jack(dot)chen(at)nokia(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Is there possibility btree_redo with XLOG_BTREE_DELETE done between standby_redo and the end of backup |
Date: | 2017-05-24 15:47:13 |
Message-ID: | 2353.1495640833@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> This looks a whole lot like a bug we fixed in 9.3.15, cf
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/DB5PR07MB15416C65687A1EA9AC0D26F8D6E00%40DB5PR07MB1541.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
> To which commit are you referring here? I don't recall any fixes
> related to that, and there is nothing in the git history indicating
> so.
Wup, sorry, I quoted the wrong thread mentioning
btree_xlog_delete_get_latestRemovedXid. The right one is
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/00F0B2CEF6D0CEF8A90119D4%40eje.credativ.lan
and the patch is
Author: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Branch: master [0e0f43d6f] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400
Branch: REL9_6_STABLE Release: REL9_6_0 [3fc489cb3] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400
Branch: REL9_5_STABLE Release: REL9_5_5 [c40bb1155] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400
Branch: REL9_4_STABLE Release: REL9_4_10 [f4e40537e] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400
Branch: REL9_3_STABLE Release: REL9_3_15 [baf111d31] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400
Branch: REL9_2_STABLE Release: REL9_2_19 [823df401d] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400
Branch: REL9_1_STABLE Release: REL9_1_24 [e3439a455] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400
Prevent starting a standalone backend with standby_mode on.
This can't really work because standby_mode expects there to be more
WAL arriving, which there will not ever be because there's no WAL
receiver process to fetch it. Moreover, if standby_mode is on then
hot standby might also be turned on, causing even more strangeness
because that expects read-only sessions to be executing in parallel.
Bernd Helmle reported a case where btree_xlog_delete_get_latestRemovedXid
got confused, but rather than band-aiding individual problems it seems
best to prevent getting anywhere near this state in the first place.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
In passing, also fix some omissions of errcodes in other ereport's in
readRecoveryCommandFile().
Michael Paquier (errcode hacking by me)
Discussion: <00F0B2CEF6D0CEF8A90119D4(at)eje(dot)credativ(dot)lan>
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | stevenchang1213 | 2017-05-24 15:48:04 | Re: Current best practice for maximum shared_buffers settings on big hardware? |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-05-24 15:39:27 | Re: Is there possibility btree_redo with XLOG_BTREE_DELETE done between standby_redo and the end of backup |