From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)debian(dot)org>, jd <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
Date: | 2011-02-17 04:34:35 |
Message-ID: | 23478.1297917275@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> In particular, getting rid of use of OpenSSL would not be sufficient
>> to satisfy the most rabid GPL partisans that we were in compliance.
> I've never heard anyone argue that position, don't believe anyone would,
> and certainly don't agree with it.
[ shrug ... ] Check the Postgres archives, from back around 2000 if
memory serves.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-02-17 04:38:33 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Hot Standby feedback for avoidance of cleanup conflicts on stand |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2011-02-17 04:23:33 | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |