Re: log_duration is redundant, no?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: log_duration is redundant, no?
Date: 2006-09-08 20:59:02
Message-ID: 23470.1157749142@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Do you want me to propose a patch or do you prefer to work on it
> yourself?

It's done already ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message elein 2006-09-08 21:02:28 Re: Domains and subtypes, a brief proposal
Previous Message Guillaume Smet 2006-09-08 20:51:42 Re: log_duration is redundant, no?