Re: File descriptors in exec'd subprocesses

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: File descriptors in exec'd subprocesses
Date: 2023-02-05 05:15:01
Message-ID: 2345944.1675574101@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 1:00 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> SUSv3 (POSIX 2008)

> Oh, oops, 2008 actually corresponds to SUSv4. Hmm.

Worst case, if we come across some allegedly-supported platform without
O_CLOEXEC, we #define that to zero. Said platform is no worse off
than it was before.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-02-05 05:16:55 Re: undersized unions
Previous Message jacktby@gmail.com 2023-02-05 04:29:40 Where is the filter?