Re: On-disk size of db increased after restore

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, PostgreSQL - General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: On-disk size of db increased after restore
Date: 2010-09-03 15:29:27
Message-ID: 23451.1283527767@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> writes:
> On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 09:41 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> This is 8.4.4 btw...
>>
>> OK, so the bug is fixed, but you still have fillfactor = 0 on the
>> affected table.

> I'm confused. I'm still seeing a bug in here: I cannot restore a dump
> effectively... Running CLUSTER or VACUUM FULL does not make any sense to
> me in here.

Oh, wait. What you need is this patch:

2010-06-06 23:01 itagaki

* doc/src/sgml/ref/create_table.sgml,
src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c (REL8_4_STABLE): Ensure
default-only storage parameters for TOAST relations to be
initialized with proper values. Affected parameters are fillfactor,
analyze_threshold, and analyze_scale_factor.

Especially uninitialized fillfactor caused inefficient page usage
because we built a StdRdOptions struct in which fillfactor is zero
if any reloption is set for the toast table.

In addition, we disallow toast.autovacuum_analyze_threshold and
toast.autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor because we didn't actually
support them; they are always ignored.

Report by Rumko on pgsql-bugs on 12 May 2010. Analysis by Tom Lane
and Alvaro Herrera. Patch by me.

Backpatch to 8.4.

which I now realize went in *post* 8.4.4.

We're really overdue for a new set of back-branch releases ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message A. Kretschmer 2010-09-03 16:01:10 Re: alter column to inet get error.
Previous Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2010-09-03 15:19:19 Re: On-disk size of db increased after restore