Re: python / 7.4 / FC5 / x86_64

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: python / 7.4 / FC5 / x86_64
Date: 2006-09-04 14:12:17
Message-ID: 23439.1157379137@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Am Montag, 4. September 2006 04:06 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
>> Patch attached - seems to work on my FC5/x86_64 box. Also contains the
>> OSX fix backported. Not sure that it qualifies as small though :-)

> It looks pretty scary to me.

> Didn't we say once that we don't want to backport fixes for platforms that
> didn't exist at the time of first release?

There's no agreed-on policy that says that, but I'd sure be hesitant to
make any invasive changes in support of adding a new port. However,
this patch doesn't look unreasonably scary to me --- AFAICS it's just
syncing python.m4 and the plpython Makefile with 8.0's versions. I
guess the question is does it break any old platforms? Are we
comfortable with the buildfarm's coverage for python on 7.4?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albe Laurenz 2006-09-04 14:14:01 Re: [PATCHES] Documentation fix for --with-ldap
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-04 13:58:12 Re: [HACKERS] Interval month, week -> day

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2006-09-04 14:49:37 Re: [PATCHES] possible ecpg vpath build error
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-04 13:58:12 Re: [HACKERS] Interval month, week -> day