From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: python / 7.4 / FC5 / x86_64 |
Date: | 2006-09-04 14:12:17 |
Message-ID: | 23439.1157379137@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Am Montag, 4. September 2006 04:06 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
>> Patch attached - seems to work on my FC5/x86_64 box. Also contains the
>> OSX fix backported. Not sure that it qualifies as small though :-)
> It looks pretty scary to me.
> Didn't we say once that we don't want to backport fixes for platforms that
> didn't exist at the time of first release?
There's no agreed-on policy that says that, but I'd sure be hesitant to
make any invasive changes in support of adding a new port. However,
this patch doesn't look unreasonably scary to me --- AFAICS it's just
syncing python.m4 and the plpython Makefile with 8.0's versions. I
guess the question is does it break any old platforms? Are we
comfortable with the buildfarm's coverage for python on 7.4?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Albe Laurenz | 2006-09-04 14:14:01 | Re: [PATCHES] Documentation fix for --with-ldap |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-04 13:58:12 | Re: [HACKERS] Interval month, week -> day |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2006-09-04 14:49:37 | Re: [PATCHES] possible ecpg vpath build error |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-04 13:58:12 | Re: [HACKERS] Interval month, week -> day |