Re: Stats collection on Windows

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Stats collection on Windows
Date: 2006-04-05 03:17:49
Message-ID: 23436.1144207069@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> writes:
> "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote
>> Redmond crowd should be able to figure out that recycling process IDs
>> instantly would be a stupid idea...)

> Can you explain more of this? IMHO, if we rely on feature like this, the
> difference is unstable-every-day vs. unstable-every-year.

The mere existence of the kill() primitive should bring to mind reasons
why it's a bad idea.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2006-04-05 03:29:42 Left joins and inheritance (table partitioning)
Previous Message Qingqing Zhou 2006-04-05 03:13:48 Re: Stats collection on Windows