| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kjetil Haaland <kjetil(dot)haaland(at)student(dot)uib(dot)no> |
| Cc: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: user defined types and strings |
| Date: | 2005-02-23 23:43:43 |
| Message-ID: | 23431.1109202223@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Kjetil Haaland <kjetil(dot)haaland(at)student(dot)uib(dot)no> writes:
> On Wednesday 23 February 2005 18:23, Michael Fuhr wrote:
>> Hmmm...haven't we already had this conversation? :-)
> We have had almost the same conversation before. The type works in my
> functions, but since the string is just a pointer to a memory place it goes
> away when the type is stored in tables in the database.
The point here is that you've built a two-part structure:
<length> <pointer to string> <some other fields>
|
+------------> text of string
and this is fundamentally not going to work. A datum has to be one
piece of memory. Consider something like
<length> <some other fields> <text of string>
where the length is now variable.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ravi shankar | 2005-02-24 05:54:34 | Transposing a table |
| Previous Message | George Weaver | 2005-02-23 22:34:47 | Re: shutdown postmaster question |