From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Kjetil Haaland <kjetil(dot)haaland(at)student(dot)uib(dot)no> |
Cc: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: user defined types and strings |
Date: | 2005-02-23 23:43:43 |
Message-ID: | 23431.1109202223@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Kjetil Haaland <kjetil(dot)haaland(at)student(dot)uib(dot)no> writes:
> On Wednesday 23 February 2005 18:23, Michael Fuhr wrote:
>> Hmmm...haven't we already had this conversation? :-)
> We have had almost the same conversation before. The type works in my
> functions, but since the string is just a pointer to a memory place it goes
> away when the type is stored in tables in the database.
The point here is that you've built a two-part structure:
<length> <pointer to string> <some other fields>
|
+------------> text of string
and this is fundamentally not going to work. A datum has to be one
piece of memory. Consider something like
<length> <some other fields> <text of string>
where the length is now variable.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ravi shankar | 2005-02-24 05:54:34 | Transposing a table |
Previous Message | George Weaver | 2005-02-23 22:34:47 | Re: shutdown postmaster question |