From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items |
Date: | 1999-05-27 20:39:11 |
Message-ID: | 23416.927837551@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> I am currently trying to investigate the poor performance reported by
>> Edmund Mergl --- since gprof doesn't really work on my Linux box, I
>> am reduced to running a profilable postmaster on my HPUX box with the
>> database area NFS-mounted from the Linux box, where there is enough disk
>> space for the benchmark. This setup gives new meaning to the term
>> "slow", but I should be able to get a useful profile out of it.
> I can run it here. What do you want me to do?
What I'm after currently is a profile of the no-indexes case. Build a
one-million-row test database using the script Edmund provided (see
his message of 22 May 1999 06:39:25 +0200), but stop the script before
it invokes "make_idx". Then, with a backend compiled -pg, run this
query:
update bench set k500k = k500k + 1 where k100 = 30
and send me the gprof results.
If you have time, it'd also be useful to have a profile of the same
update with indexes in place (run Edmund's make_idx script and then do
the update again).
I'm pretty close to having a profile from my NFS lashup, but it would
be nice to have profiles of the same thing from other machines as
a cross-check that no artifacts are getting introduced...
thanks, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Bruccoleri | 1999-05-27 20:59:48 | Port for SGI Irix using today's snapshot. |
Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 1999-05-27 19:44:10 | RE: [HACKERS] Problems w/ LO |