Re: No PUBLIC access by default?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Fein <pfein(at)pobox(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: No PUBLIC access by default?
Date: 2005-08-11 21:44:45
Message-ID: 23407.1123796685@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Actually, that last grant is implicit. When an ACL is found to be null,
> it's considered to have a grant to public.

No, it's considered to be whatever the default for the object type is.
Read the GRANT manual page.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-08-11 21:52:05 Re: Upgrading 7.3.9 -> 7.4.8 - trouble with blobs
Previous Message Ed L. 2005-08-11 21:29:29 Re: insert performance riddle