Re: turning of pg_xlog

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com>
Cc: Jonny <blubb(at)terminalschmiede(dot)de>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: turning of pg_xlog
Date: 2008-09-30 18:44:38
Message-ID: 23386.1222800278@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com> writes:
> You should also understand that if you set checkpoint_segments to a
> small number, its still possible that PostgreSQL might use more than
> that number for a large transaction.

"Large transactions" have nothing to do with this. You are confusing
Postgres' implementation with Oracle's.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Plugge, Joe R. 2008-09-30 18:49:41 Re: turning of pg_xlog
Previous Message Chander Ganesan 2008-09-30 18:13:52 Re: turning of pg_xlog