From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Locking a row with KEY SHARE NOWAIT blocks |
Date: | 2019-09-03 13:31:36 |
Message-ID: | 23380.1567517496@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> writes:
> When you lock a row with FOR KEY SHARE, and the row's non-key columns
> have been updated, heap_lock_tuple() walks the update chain to mark all
> the in-progress tuple versions also as locked. But it doesn't pay
> attention to the NOWAIT or SKIP LOCKED flags when doing so. The
> heap_lock_updated_tuple() function walks the update chain, but the
> 'wait_policy' argument is not passed to it. As a result, a SELECT in KEY
> SHARE NOWAIT query can block waiting for another updating transaction,
> despite the NOWAIT modifier.
> This can be reproduced with the attached isolation test script.
> I'm not sure how to fix this. The logic to walk the update chain and
> propagate the tuple lock is already breathtakingly complicated :-(.
Why are we locking any but the most recent version?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2019-09-03 14:04:49 | Re: [PATCH] Tab completion for CREATE OR REPLACE |
Previous Message | fn ln | 2019-09-03 13:27:49 | Re: BUG #15977: Inconsistent behavior in chained transactions |