| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: elog() patch |
| Date: | 2002-03-04 02:02:54 |
| Message-ID: | 23380.1015207374@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> OK, now that the elog() patch is in, we can discuss NOTICE. I know
> Peter wants to keep NOTICE to reduce the number of changes, but I
> already have a few votes that the existing NOTICE messages should be
> changed to a tag of WARNING.
If you're taking a vote, I vote with Peter. I don't much care for the
thought of EXPLAIN results coming out tagged WARNING ;-)
In any case, simple renamings like this ought to be carried out as part
of the prefix-tagging of elog names that we intend to do late in 7.3,
no? I see no value in having two rounds of widespread changes instead
of just one.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-03-04 02:18:09 | Re: elog() patch |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-03-03 23:42:17 | Re: elog() patch |