Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> You seem to have forgotten HEAD.
> On HEAD I intend to rearrange the headers more rationally - see earlier
> email to -hackers.
Fine, but the corresponding changes should go into all the branches
concurrently, so that people aren't confused about whether the omission
is intentional or not. It's hard enough keeping track of multiple
branches without creating irrelevant random differences in their commit
histories.
regards, tom lane