Re: SIGTERM/FATAL error

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SIGTERM/FATAL error
Date: 2001-03-12 00:49:14
Message-ID: 23365.984358154@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I have applied the following patch to make SIGTERM backend exit clearer
> in the the server logs. "The system" is not really shutting down, but
> "the backend" is shutting down.

This is a non-improvement. Please reverse it. SIGTERM would only be
sent to a backend if the database system were in fact shutting down.

> Should we be showing the PID's in the server logs more. Do we need to
> enable that somewhere?

There's already an option for that, but it should not be forced on since
it will be redundant for those using syslog.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-12 00:53:15 Re: SIGTERM/FATAL error
Previous Message Franck Martin 2001-03-11 22:04:38 RE: doxygen & PG