From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: CVS tip problems |
Date: | 2004-06-01 13:51:11 |
Message-ID: | 2336.1086097871@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> - strerror_r(errnum, strerrbuf, buflen);
> + char buf[256];
> + StrNCpy(strerrbuf, strerror_r(errnum, buf, 256), buflen);
> return strerrbuf;
Easier and safer would be
> - strerror_r(errnum, strerrbuf, buflen);
> - return strerrbuf;
> + return strerror_r(errnum, strerrbuf, buflen);
The real point here is that we need to code differently depending on
which flavor of strerror_r we have.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2004-06-01 14:39:31 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] select like...not using index |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-01 13:42:46 | Re: Fast index build vs. PITR |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2004-06-01 19:12:55 | small fix in FAQ |
Previous Message | Harald Fuchs | 2004-06-01 08:10:38 | Re: pg_dump --comment? |