Re: TOAST & vacuum

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TOAST & vacuum
Date: 2000-07-21 18:29:50
Message-ID: 23354.964204190@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

JanWieck(at)t-online(dot)de (Jan Wieck) writes:
> TOAST is now vacuum-safe. When needed, the toaster creates a
> second heap tuple, containing only plain or compressed
> values. This one is then returned by the heap access methods
> to the caller, so indices will never contain external
> references.

That should be sufficient for insertions into existing indexes,
but what about CREATE INDEX on a column that already contains
toasted values? That works with fetched tuples, not ones formed
during insert/update.

I think a cleaner and more reliable short-term hack would be to twiddle
index_formtuple() to detoast any externally-stored attributes. AFAIK,
in current sources all paths for creating an index tuple go through that
routine, and it has a tupdesc handy so it knows which attributes are of
varlena type.

This way you wouldn't need to hack up the tuptoaster itself.

Also, this would work for functional indexes whereas the way you are
doing it will not (a function could return a toasted Datum extracted
from some other table, no?).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-07-21 18:29:53 Re: About these IPC parameters
Previous Message Oliver Elphick 2000-07-21 15:51:20 Re: Shared library search paths