Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE

From: Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE
Date: 2016-03-24 10:05:36
Message-ID: 23320f11-6a4e-4342-80a8-1f1a71bb21f0@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Meskes wrote:
> While ecpg may not be the choice for new applications, there are a lot
> of legacy applications out there that need ecpg to be migrated to
> PostgreSQL.

2016 is a good time to rewrite them. ;)
I think Postgres will be more likely if it would be a little less concerned
about compatibility IMHO.
But I will not insist. My problem with ecpg I decided.

Thanks.
--
Yury Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2016-03-24 10:13:37 Re: Relation extension scalability
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2016-03-24 10:00:48 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2