Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5?
Date: 2007-10-18 14:45:29
Message-ID: 23319.1192718729@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> Bummer. There are lots of ways to break installcheck though - locale
> being one I get biten by all the time...

Hmm, which locale do you use and what breakage do you see?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-10-18 14:48:02 Re: Strange error dropping foreign key
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-10-18 14:39:55 Re: Why copy_relation_data only use wal whenWALarchivingis enabled