Re: DROP EXTENSION

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michelle Schwan <mschwan(at)opentext(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DROP EXTENSION
Date: 2016-06-21 22:55:55
Message-ID: 23302.1466549755@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Michelle Schwan <mschwan(at)opentext(dot)com> writes:
> Ok - I understand!
> However, could that be stated in the documentation so that is clear?

I had thought it *was* documented, but can't find such a statement at
the moment. However, the natural place to document it would be in
section 5.13 "Dependency Tracking", and/or in discussions of user-defined
functions; this behavior really has nothing to do with extensions per se.
So I'm not sure it would have helped you :-(

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-06-22 00:15:35 Re: DROP EXTENSION
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-06-21 18:32:58 Re: DROP EXTENSION