David Ayers <d(dot)ayers(at)inode(dot)at> writes:
> It's been reported that on some systems
> we get something like:
> %d/%m/%Y %H:%M:%S.00 %Z
> and others:
> %m-%d-%Y %H:%M:%S %Z
> Is this version/local dependent?
No, but it is dependent on the DateStyle configuration variable ...
regards, tom lane