| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is initdb needed from 8.0.0rc3 to 8.0.0? |
| Date: | 2005-01-19 04:45:28 |
| Message-ID: | 23265.1106109928@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> If the catalog versions match then you shouldn't need to do an
> initdb; if they're different then you will. Making a full dump
> anyway before upgrading might be prudent just in case, however.
> The most recent catalog version change appears to have been committed
> on 2004/11/05. I think 8.0.0beta4 was the next version after that,
> so if you're running 8.0.0beta4 or later then I wouldn't expect an
> initdb to be required to move to 8.0.0. But don't hold me to that....
This information is easy to discern from the cvsweb page for
catversion.h:
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/catalog/catversion.h
which shows that versions older than beta5 will require an initdb.
(The apparent update on 12/31 was just to change the copyright-date
comment.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jamie Deppeler | 2005-01-19 04:45:53 | update in triggers |
| Previous Message | Paul Tillotson | 2005-01-19 04:13:24 | Re: Easy transaction question |