| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: reorganizing partitioning code |
| Date: | 2018-03-21 17:33:34 |
| Message-ID: | 23250.1521653614@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> David Steele wrote:
>> Are you planning to update this patch? If not, I think it should be
>> marked as Returned with Feedback and submitted to the next CF once it
>> has been updated.
> This is no new development, only code movement. I think it would be
> worse to have three different branches of partitioning code, v10
> "basic", v11 "powerful but not reorganized", v12 "reorganized". I'd
> rather have only v10 "basic" and v11+ "powerful".
> Let's keep this entry open till the last minute.
Nonetheless, it's March 21. David's point is that it's time to get a
move on.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-03-21 17:57:01 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade to clusters with a different WAL segment size |
| Previous Message | David Steele | 2018-03-21 17:31:32 | Re: Re: Sample values for pg_stat_statements |