Re: libpq_r

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq_r
Date: 2003-07-24 14:48:06
Message-ID: 23222.1059058086@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Now I see what you are saying, that _REENTRANT just makes it reentrant,
> and doesn't have a downside in terms of performance.

That's at best an unsupported assertion. Why would the platform bother
with supplying two copies of libc if they didn't think there was a
performance hit?

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: libpq_r at 2003-07-24 14:44:27 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lee Kindness 2003-07-24 14:51:44 Re: libpq_r
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-07-24 14:45:45 Re: Why select * from function doesn't work when function