Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date: 2024-03-25 01:27:18
Message-ID: 2322086.1711330038@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Hmm, before 30e144287 this code only ran in a test module, is it
> possible Coverity would not find it there?

That could indeed explain why Coverity didn't see it. I'm not
sure how our community run is set up, but it may not build the
test modules.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-03-25 01:32:17 Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos
Previous Message Japin Li 2024-03-25 01:24:58 Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos