| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Andrew Atkinson <andyatkinson(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, samay(at)tembo(dot)io |
| Subject: | Re: An improved README experience for PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2024-02-28 17:17:04 |
| Message-ID: | 2322053.1709140624@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Sorry, my suggestion wasn't meant to imply that I have any strong concerns
> about maintaining two README files. If we can automate generating one or
> the other, that'd be great, but I don't see that as a prerequisite to
> adding a Markdown version.
Agreed, and I'd go so far as to say that adding automation now
would be investing work that might well go to waste. When and
if we get annoyed by the manual labor involved in maintaining
two copies, it'd be time to put work into automating it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-02-28 17:25:32 | Re: An improved README experience for PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-02-28 17:10:48 | Re: An improved README experience for PostgreSQL |