| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "John Smith" <sodgodofall(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Performance of aggregates over set-returning functions |
| Date: | 2008-06-10 00:17:24 |
| Message-ID: | 2322.1213057044@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
"John Smith" <sodgodofall(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Sorry for the long delay in following up on this suggestion. The
> change Tom suggested fixed the performance problems I was seeing, but
> I never ran the full regression suite on the modified code, as
> everything in my performance tests seemed to indicate the bug was
> fixed (i.e, no errors even with --cassert-enabled). When I recently
> ran the regression suite on the "fixed" version of Postgres, the
> "misc" test suite fails with the following error message: "ERROR:
> cache lookup failed for type 2139062143". Is this a manifestation of
> the problem where certain items are being freed too early?
Yup --- something's trying to use memory that's already been freed.
The particular case is evidently a field containing a type OID.
You might be able to get a clue where the problem is by getting a gdb
stack trace back from errfinish(), but this sort of kills my optimism
that the 7.0-era problem is gone ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zoltan Boszormenyi | 2008-06-11 09:56:04 | Scalability question |
| Previous Message | John Smith | 2008-06-09 22:57:52 | Re: Performance of aggregates over set-returning functions |